Littman 3200 BT Stethoscope & Zargis Cardioscan - Is the PC the problem?

Am midway through testing the Littman 3200 BT Stethoscope and accompanying Zargis Cardioscan and StethAssist software. First, the scope and software do work as advertised.  User interface on the scope was relatively simple and didn't really require much training.  Similarly the software (both the StethAssist which ships with the stethoscope) and the $395 Cardioscan software do work reasonably well.  The problem is in the logistics.

Most of us physicians practice out of several exam rooms and usually are under significant time constraints.  In my clinic we have wireless desktop PC's with large 21" swivel monitors that are primarily for the patient to view along with the physician our digital records, radiologic images and patient information.  The EMR software (Cerner's PowerChart) is running on Citrix servers. Each of these devices is networked autologon device that is rigidly controlled for security purposes (limiting SD, BT local CD connections).

The Cardioscan software runs on a PC and after inputing the patient information and wirelessly connecting with the stethoscope guides the physician through the steps of collecting heart tones from the 4 standard chest locations (takes nearly 2 minutes to collect all of the information). When finished the softare analyzes the data and produces a graphical and sound output that highlights any murmurs that might be present.

So far so good. The problem is when I move from one exam room to another it's not easy to manage both the PC softare, the scope, the patient and the EMR that is collecting information at the point of care.  Installing the software on each of the exam room machines is possible but in our clinic that would entail loading it on 32 devices.  More limiting is that each of us with one of these stethoscopes would need to carry around the BT dongle and plugging it in to the networked devices would entail security changes that would compromise the network.  Right now we have to carry our own tablets or notebooks into the room along with the scope in order to use it effectively.  Even so, the logistics would quickly prevent the effective and timely use of this. The extra time would convert to lost appointments and revenue.

What's needed is for the software to reside on the scope itself allowing us to record a complete sequence.  The scope is able to record data but only short segments that can't be paired with specific locations for the Cardioscan software. Unfortunately the small user interface prevents a challenge.  What I'd really like to see is the Cardioscan software be published as an iPhone App.  This would allow us the flexibility and freedom to move quickly in the exam rooms, on the floor and other locations and collect heart tones needed for downstream analysis and documentation.

There's another problem.  The stethoscope costs around $400.  It ships with a virtually useless SethAssist software that does not provide any analytical tools and has very limited functionality.  Zargis then hits the user with another $400 for the more useful CardioScan software (and also nails you for $17 shipping and handling!).  Spending $800 for an 80% solution sticks in my craw as a primary care physician and especially for medical students and residents who would find this most useful.

Recommendations to Littman and Zargis: 

1. Make sure the BT is BT2 allowing pairing with multiple devices.
2. Enable the software to be easily installed on multiple devices.
3. Lower the price of the software with residents and PCPs in mind
4. Dump StethAssist and ship the system with CardioScan
5. Create an iPhone, Pre and other BT enabled device App and enable pairing of the scope to all of these smart phones

Oh, the same advice goes to Welch-Allyn who also manufacture digital otoscopes and ophthalmoscopes.  The problem to effective use is all in the logistics. It's not possible for a physician to control these devices AND click or manipulate an accompanying software on a PC or video screen in order to capture images to place in the EMR.  The controls have to be on the device and the connection has to be wireless to a very mobile device that can be carried on rounds, into many different exam rooms, nursing homes and wherever the patient being examined happens to be.